Clarification on IP Rights Policy
Jane Silber
on 15 July 2015
We are updating our Intellectual Property Rights Policy to clarify the relationship between this policy and the licences of the constituent works in Ubuntu. Specifically, we are adding a single clause which states:
“Ubuntu is an aggregate work of many works, each covered by their own licence(s). For the purposes of determining what you can do with specific works in Ubuntu, this policy should be read together with the licence(s) of the relevant packages. For the avoidance of doubt, where any other licence grants rights, this policy does not modify or reduce those rights under those licences.”
We are proud to choose the GPL as the default licence for the software that Canonical writes, and we do that because we believe it is the licence that creates the most freedoms for its users. We have always recognised those rights in this Policy, and over the course of a long conversation with the Free Software Foundation and others, we agreed to eliminate any doubt by adding this new language.
We would like to thank the Free Software Foundation and the Software Freedom Conservancy for their suggestions in this regard over the past year. We’ll continue to evolve our policies, in consultation with the very diverse groups that make up the open source community, to reflect best practice and the needs of Canonical and the Ubuntu community.
Talk to us today
Interested in running Ubuntu in your organisation?
Newsletter signup
Related posts
Canonical announces it will distribute NVIDIA DOCA-OFED in Ubuntu
Today Canonical, the publishers of Ubuntu, announced that it will integrate and distribute the NVIDIA DOCA-OFED networking driver with Ubuntu.
Meet Canonical at NVIDIA GTC 2026
Previewing at the event: NVIDIA CUDA support in Ubuntu 26.04 LTS, NVIDIA Vera Rubin NVL72 architecture support in Ubuntu 26.04 LTS, Canonical’s official...
AppArmor vulnerability fixes available
Qualys discovered several vulnerabilities in the AppArmor code of the Linux kernel. These are being referred to as CrackArmor, while CVE IDs have not been...